Showing posts with label Green Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Green Party. Show all posts

Friday, August 29, 2008

Your Black World: Barack Obama, and the Dark Cloud of Infallibility


By: Tolu Olorunda

Barack Obama, having been born to a Kenyan Father, must be accountable to Africans, Africa and its descendants. His life story seems to have gripped the hearts and minds of millions around the world, but a much darker cloud hovers around the man known to many - both Black and White - as the 'Change machine.' Whether Obama's fans and supporters muster up the courage to admit this fact or not, not much can be deducted from the reality that the Illinois Senator has numerously spat in the face of Africans, African Americans, South-Americans and Palestinians. If Sen. Obama is not pressured by the African-American Community into re-thinking his policies vis-a-vis Africa, Sen. Obama would, knowingly or unknowingly, incorporate the identity of what the grand-educator, Dr. John Henrik Clarke described as, "Brown Skin White Men." Africans in Africa have, for an extended period of time, experienced the phenomenon of dark-skinned presidents with Eurocentric interests and sensibilities. The only difference between what has been, and what might become, is the vehement disapproval and dissent from amongst the oppressed constituency which has historically set a precedent. Unfortunately, what many African-Americans are failing to realize, is that this moment in history would mark a rare occurrence in which a Black Man with a record of anti-African ideologies, gets elected president. This would inevitably further the already established rift between Africans and African-Americans -- as Africans would look over the horizon and see the perpetrator of oppression and repression in Africa as a Black man, courtesy of a 90% approval rating amongst the Black American Community. Obama knows this, but callously proceeds with his mythical call for inter-racial and inter-ethnic unity. He has chosen to walk a path that overwrites his African Ancestry. As a Son of Africa and America, Obama understood, more than most, that there comes a time when one must shed the cloak of double-play, and pick a side to fight for, and on behalf of. It is at this point, unequivocally clear, which side Obama is rooting for.

As the well-packaged NBA playoffs ad went, "There can only be one." It is virtually impossible for any sitting president to straddle the fence between good and evil. In the wildfire sport of American politics, it is imperative that one pick what team to play on. This reality became increasingly obvious, when Dennis Kucinich was openly refused podiums at 'Democratic' debates, in spite of the illegality involved. It also played out in the John Edwards campaign -- as many saw 2008 as his year and moment to finally clinch the Democratic Party presidential nomination after two unsuccessful attempts in the past. Little did John Edwards know, that running on a platform which strived to pick up where Dr. King left off vis-a-vis poverty, would automatically handicap any such political endeavors. Barack Obama, much to the oblivion of his fan base, has chosen to play the field for the most egregious lobbyists and serial-capitalists this nation - and really the world - has to offer. It will be a shame if the efforts of Margaret Kimberly, Glen Ford, Paul Street, Bruce Dixon and Adolf Reed Jr. fall short of the intended mark: resurrecting the millions of Obama zombies who clap and chant at his every word. His many supporters argue that Senator Obama's historic presidential bid is a lasting inspiration for young Black and Brown kids who have been relegated to hopelessness and despondency at the thought of being underrepresented - if at all represented - by the former and present presidents of their country. I respectfully disagree.

Black and Brown kids are not dumb or incapable of political analysis. They are well aware of the back-bending, tap-dancing and circus-clowning that Barack Obama has had to execute to make White folks feel comfortable enough to vote for him. They have witnessed his relentless extrication from "Black" and "Brown" and "Native-American"-specific issues, and his constant willingness to pursue and publicly tackle those "white only" subject-matters. They have heard his unforgivable remarks after the verdict in the Sean Bell case, and his condescending comments hurled at Black parents who are financially-disempowered and unable to provide nutritional meals for their kids, so therefore feed their kids the remnant from the previous night's fast-food snack (He used Popeyes as an example). They also witnessed his thundering remonstration against Black Men in his infamous "Father's Day Speech," in which he claimed that Black Men were somehow predisposed to sitting in the house and watching "SportsCenter all weekend long” -- notwithstanding the fact that in a previous interview, he admitted to “Monday Night Football” being his "favorite TV Show" and watching "a lot of SportsCenter — for better or worse.” Black and Brown kids are well informed about his unabashed endorsement of Africom -- a clear militarization, pulverization and westernization of African soil and oil. Black and Brown kids don't need CNN to decipher Obama's naiveté, and the exploitation of it by Washington Insiders and political-sophists (also known as strategists). They can also decode the science behind Rev. Jesse Jackson's vulgar but veracious condemnation of Obama's vicious disposal towards Black Americans, and the immediate and detectable difference in Obama's rhetoric afterwards. They view Rev. Jesse's conduct as a God-given right to forcefully push Sen. Obama in the direction of righteousness. Many Black and Brown kids are not inspired, but inhibited.

On August 1, in a campaign rally at St. Petersburg, Florida, something timely happened: Obama was, for the first time in a long time, doused with a dose of reality. Like the biblical tale of the 'three wise men' who overcame numerous hurdles in favor of fulfilling a prophetic mission, three young Black men from the Uhuru Movement - under the leadership of Chairman Omali Yeshitela - stood up, with great candor, and challenged Obama to a roll call of 'Black and African specific Issues.' One would imagine that the once-community-organizer would excel exceedingly well in a field he has occasionally boasted to have 'majored-in.' But what ensued for the next 5 minutes, could only be described as a singular coherent-line of "I think you are misinformed," and a marathon of stuttering that would make Moses blush. Barack Obama's concertgoers were being introduced to another side of him that they - quite obviously - weren't prepared to see. To shield their precious Obama from this unusual moment of embarrassment, his supporters drowned the cry, compassion and cause of Diop Olugbala - the lead protester - in emotional chants of "Yes We Can." The crowd's display was reminiscent of the very first episode of the animated political-show, "The Boondocks," in which the lead character, "Huey," at a Garden Party, spoke pejoratively and disparagingly of Ronald Reagan, Mel Gibson and White people in general -- much to the adoration and admiration of the nearly all-white listening audience. Explaining this phenomenon to his Granddad, he said, "They love me. These people aren't worried about us. They're not worried about anything. They're rich. No matter what happens, these people just keep applauding." Senator Obama, in a very disturbing way personifies this character -- as the man in their eyes, who can do no wrong. At the incipient of the Uhuru protest, one witnesses certain White members in the crowd, who leaped from their sit to silence the activists, and upon Obama's immediate censure of the heckling, their applause and chants only accelerated.

When the issue of the Green Party is raised and how Cynthia McKinney - with the assistance of Rosa Clemente - can be an exceptional asset in exerting progressive pressure upon Obama's candidacy, many - including Renowned poet, Amiri Baraka - deplore the very thought. But how else is Sen. Obama to answer the clarion call of the Black Community if no threat to his rigid fan base within that very community is established? With this reality, I'm compelled to believe that not only are the bulk of Obama's supporters unwilling to face the truth, but they have become de-synthesized to the crisis and potential failures that could erupt from his presidency -- based on the political platforms and proposals he has, thus far, tabled. The disciples of Barack Obama claim – with much delight – that one of the incentives of an Obama Presidency is the readiness of Barack Obama to be held accountable. This farce was, of course, drafted to convince progressives into perceiving the potential candidacy of Obama as a resource worth tapping into. Regrettably, if Barack Obama truly hopes to be held to the highest standard of accountability, he wouldn’t have failed the first preliminary test so easily. Regardless of the millions who demanded that Mr. Obama not support the FISA legislation he once denounced, Obama proceeded to cast a vote in support of retro-active immunity for the companies which knowingly abetted illegal and corrupt activities. This can’t possibly a good sign of what’s to come. Obamamites choose to disagree, but one thing remains indisputable and irrefutable: If ALL of Obama's supporter-base was, today, awoken from their slumber and sleep-walking, Cynthia McKinney would be the 44th President of the U.S., with Rosa Clemente as her V.P. For Obama's campaign managers, there seems to be a vested interest in keeping his supporters asleep.


Sunday, August 24, 2008

Your Black World: In Response To Bro. Wattree's Response

“First, Bro. Olorunda, I'd like to point out that I have a serious problem with the title of your piece. As I'm sure you're aware, Dick Cheney is often referred to as Bush's brain. So… unless you have some evidence to substantiate that assumed fact…”

Sen. Joe Biden is a 6-term Senator, who served on the Judiciary Committee from 1981 to 1995. He is also the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Sen. Barack Obama is a one-term Senator, who has barely made any landmark difference in the Senate during his short-tenure. Unless one believes in the tooth-fairy, the reason behind the selection of Biden is unmistakable.

“You then go on to say, "Many have queried Obama's obsession with the presidency of JFk , and its unmistakable impact upon the Obama campaign and it's decision-making." What evidence do you have that Obama is "Obsessed" with JFK, and what evidence do you have that this "obsession" is having an "unmistakable impact upon the Obama campaign and its decision making"?

Ted Sorensen, JFK’s chief speechwriter, was quick to point out the glaring similarities in personality, style, poise and position between JFK and BO. He wrote, “Both Kennedy and Obama have fantastically winning smiles and I might say both are very relaxed in front of an audience and on television." Senator Obama received this as a compliment. In January this year, Caroline Kennedy, JFK’s daughter, penned a piece in the New York Times op-ed page, entitled “A President like My Father.” In it, she spoke of the magnificent promises Obama hopes to fulfill, if given a chance at the White House. She concluded her misguiding piece, saying, “I have never had a president who inspired me the way people tell me that my father inspired them.” Obama returned this favor by bestowing upon her, the distinguished opportunity of selecting his V.P.

“You link to an article by Paul Street. Who is he, and what credentials does he have that allows you to be so reliant on his opinion? In other words, what makes Paul Street an authority on either JFK or Obama, and how does he constitute “many”?

Paul Street is a veteran journalist who has been unmasking the imperial face of Barack Obama since 2004. You might want to pick up his newest book, “Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics.” Perhaps you might learn something different about your candidate, Barack Obama, if you entertained a different perspective. The thousands, and possibly millions of those who refuse to inhale the “Hope Bong” is what constitutes as many.

You then continue to say, "It does appear rather ironic that Sen. Obama would, just as JFK did in 1960 with Lyndon Baines Johnson, choose a running mate whose rhetoric and record is diametrically misaligned to that of the presidential candidate." What's so "ironic" about Obama's choice of Biden”?

Thanks for granting me the opportunity to expose Sen. Biden and his subordinate (Sen. Obama) for what they truly represent. If Barack Obama is truly honest in his decision to pull-out troops from Iraq, he wouldn’t pick a running mate who formerly stated, “I would support continuing what Democrats are trying to do now: transition our troops out of the civil war and into a limited mission of targeted counter-terrorism operations against Al Qaeda and like-minded groups, training Iraqis and force protection.” A truly progressive candidate wouldn’t select as a V.P, the author of the infamous, “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994” aka the “1994 Crime Bill” I’m referring to a bill which deposited 100,000 more cops on the street and escalated the incarceration rate of Black and Brown youth. If Barack Obama is the democrat he claims to be, the stark contradictions between his track-record and that of Biden should be self-revealing – unless Obama is in full support of a Police State (which would explain his FISA vote).

“Your reference to "Washington-insiders" is grossly misleading. You were obviously trying to imply that since Biden has been in the senate so long, that constitutes what Obama criticizes as Washington insiders. But your own link clearly demonstrates that Obama is referring to those in Washington who have close ties with Washington lobbyists. Did you fail to understand that, or were you purposely trying to mislead the reader, assuming that they wouldn't bother to check the link?”

To keep it plain and simple, I turn to an ABC News article published yesterday: “The industry that has given Biden the most cash has been lawyers/law firms ($6,567,404) followed by real estate ($1,297,690). Pro-Israel groups are the 8th biggest contributing industry. Obama may decry lobbyist cash (or at least federal lobbyist cash), but Biden has taken $344,400 from lobbyists since 1997 -- making lobbyists the 10th biggest contributing industry. That seems a direct contradiction of the Obama message.”

“All of these flaws were drawn from just your first paragraph. I would go on, but I think I've made my point.”

With all due respect, I believe the article is irrefutable, and I welcome any further attempts at invalidation.

“After reading your piece I'd like to ask you a question in response: What does it profit a man to forfeit his soul and gain nothing? That seems to be what you're asking Black people to do.”

I would like to pose your question back to you. “What does it profit a man to forfeit his soul and gain nothing”? If we cannot lend credence to our conscience, and all we pursue is the felicity of an historical moment, we would have to explain to the next generation - and the one coming after them - why their livelihood was traded for the comfort of the historicalness of Obama’s presidency. As far as I can tell, it’s not just Black folks engaging in quid pro quo.