BENEATH THE SPIN * ERIC L. WATTREE THE MODERN BLACK MAN: 21ST CENTURY ARGUMENTS FOR 19TH CENTURY THINKING Less than three hours after Barack Obama declared his candidacy for presidency, the feeding frenzy began among Black people. It just so happened that Sen. Obama declared his candidacy on the same day as Tavis Smiley's "State of Black America" national broadcast, and many had the audacity to criticize him for not putting off this historic event so he could appear on Tavis' broadcast. And during the broadcast--again, on this historic occasionDr. Cornel West of Harvard University ranted on national television that the Black community should be asking Obama, "How deep is your love for your people" and "Where is your money coming from?" He indicated that Barack didn't put this historic event off to appear on Tavis' broadcast because he had people talking to him that didn't warrant our trust. And as he was saying these things, Tavis was standing there grinning like a chess cat, prowling a South Georgia cotton field. That was the moment that Barack Obama got my unwavering support. It was at that very moment that I decided that this man was going to get my vote--and if that vote was wasted, as many suggested it would be at the time, so be it. Because it was on that day, and at that very moment, that I fully recognized the depth of our self-loathing, and the psychological corruption of my people. Later on that day I wrote, "as African Americans we are the product of a racist societyand not just any racist society, but a society that is more efficient in producing subtle racists than any other society that has ever existed on the face of this Earth. Due to the necessity of America's need to subjugate Black people, while at the same time, live up to the hypocrisy of our "All men are created equal" credo, a form of racism has spontaneously evolved that is so subtle that even Black people have become racist against themselvesand amazingly, without even knowing it. As a direct result, Black people in America hate other Black people just as profoundly, and even more violently, than the most virulent White racist in the South. Clear evidence of that is the fact that of the thousands of homicides committed against Blacks every year, not one perpetrator was reported to have been wearing a sheet." I continue to hold that belief, and it's been continually reinforced throughout this election. It seems to me that the only difference between the modern Black man and the 19th century Black man, who shuffled about more interested in the master's welfare than his own, is the sophistication of his argument. Today, instead of simply saying that we can't trust him because he's Black, we say, "The people talking to him don't warrant our trust." And today, instead of saying, "No Black man has sense enough to run this plantation", we say, "He lacks experience." The situation is such that it's not safe for this brother to open his mouth without somebody parsing every comma, trying to find something to criticizeand when they can't find anything, they speculate about what he might have meant, or second guess what he should have said, or question his motives. On father's Day Barack spoke at the Apostolic Church of God, a predominately Black church in Chicago, Il. During his speech he discussed the need for man young Black men to step up to the plate and become better fathers. He pointed out that children who grow up without a father in the home are five times more likely to grow up in poverty, nine time more likely to drop out of school, and twenty times more likely to end up in prison. He also spoke of his own experience without a father. He recalled seeing how embarrassed his mother was to have to go to the market with food stamps in order to feed the family, and the pain she suffered when she couldn't get him some of the things that other children had. He also spoke of the epidemic of children killing children in the black community, and asked, "How many are we willing to lose?" Believe it or not, there were many in the Black community who took serious issue with that speech. Even Dr. Boyce Watkins, one of this nation's most prominent scholars (note that I didn't limit it to "Black scholar"), a brother that I consider a friend, and I highly respect, took issue. He asked, "why he waited to speak at a predominantly black church to give the message only to black parents?" My response to Dr. Watkins was, had Senator Obama gone to a predominantly white forum to criticize black fatherhood, there might have been some validity to the argument that it was inappropriate, but that was far from the case. First, it wasn't black fatherhood he was criticizing. In fact, he took the time to commend those black fathers who had stepped up to the plate. He also went out of his way to praise his wife's father, who in spite of a severe disability that required him to get up an hour earlier than most people just to get to work on time, he managed to step up to the plate and bring the type of excellence to his parental responsibility that allowed him to raise two well rounded and successful children. So he wasn't criticizing black fatherhood at allon the contrary, he was encouraging those being less than responsible to rethink their way of life. And as for the propriety of addressing this issue in a predominantly black forum, I don't understand the objection. He told the truth, in a black setting, as a black man who grew up without a father. Who better to speak to an issue that needs so badly to be addressed in the black community than one of the most prominent figures in the community? And what would be a more appropriate place to deliver such a message than in a black church, and among black people? It seems to me that a good case could have been made that he would have been remiss not to have given such a speech. We often talk about the courage to speak truth to power. That's exactly what Sen. Obama demonstrated. He's not a stupid man he remembers the backlash that came down on Bill Cosby for broaching this very same subject. And even Rev. Al Sharpton said he was taking a big chance. Yet, in spite of the fact that he desperately needs black support to win the presidency, he decided that it was so important to delivered this message to his people that he was willing to take the chance on losing that support. That is the true meaning of speaking truth to power. The brother should be applauded instead of criticized, and I think he would have been if it were not for a latent undercurrent of hatred and distrust of Black people--but ironically, this time it's among ourselves. Eric L. Wattree wattree.blogspot.com Stay on top of what's going on around you. From Hip Hop to world and national news--stay informed about those things that impact both the Black community and the entire world, as interpreted by Dr. Boyce Watkins and some of the nation's top Black writers. Stay in touch with Your Black World www.yourblackworld.com/. It's our piece of the net. | ||
Sunday, June 22, 2008
THE MODERN BLACK MAN: 21ST CENTURY ARGUMENTS FOR 19TH CENTURY THINKING
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
Hey Eric,
nice article. One concern I have about Barack is that if he was telling truth about black men, why did he not stand for truth when Jeremiah Wright (a man who is more educated than Barack who has done more military service) spoke up, Obama shut him down. I guarantee you that if Jeremiah or anyone had gone into a white venue and said "While many whites do the right thing, there are far too many who are choosing to be racists instead of good Americans. Nowhere is this more true than in the white community", that person would be fried, disowned and denounced by Barack Obama.
Barack's desire to "tell the truth" (even though studies show that black absentee fathers are just as likely as white absentee fathers to spend time with their kids, especially when you hold economic circumstances constant) should not be selective. Either tell the whole racial story in an intelligent fashion or don't address it at all.
I know we have this whole "we gotta be quiet so we can sneak into the White House" thing going on with black america, but if you give up all of your self-respect just to get elected, you find yourself at the finish line with nothing left to give.
Barack giving that speech was as flawed as Jeremiah Wright speaking at the National Press Club. I will most likely vote for Obama, but he does not get a blank check for degrading black men and women. If he had spent mother's day talking about the stereotype of black mothers on welfare, I would be equally irritated. Black women who were applauding Obama's choice to spend Fathers Day speaking negatively on stereotypes should realize that you might be next on the list. To spend fathers day talking about bad fathers is like going to someone's birthday party with a list of things you hate about them.
Obama needs to chill out. I am not interested in being thrown under the bus so he can get elected, we've worked too hard for that. Again, I don't need preferential treatment from him because he's black, I only demand that I get the same respect he gives white men. So, when he gives a speech and spends 40 minutes discussing white male stereotypes, then I will be satisfied. But of course, no one is more flawed than the black male, we're the only ones who make mistakes.
Actually Obama was catering to white conservatives with that speech. That's why Bill O'Reilly applauded him.
Bro. Boyce,
Let’s leave the White man out of this for a moment. The fact is, it’s undeniable that we have a serious problem in our community. You know my background, so I’m very sensitive to it--I came very close to losing my life as a result of that problem. Even now, every time I write “Dr. Watkins” I ache from the thought of what might have been. But it’s too late for me to do anything about that at this point in my life, but it’s not too late to save the lives and self-esteem of the young Black men who are coming up. So when I look at our youth, I don’t want to see a generation of Eric Wattrees, I want to see thousands, millions, of Dr. Boyce Watkins’.
So I don’t give a damn about the White man–in fact, I’m convinced that our preoccupation with him is a form of worship. The only thing I care about is correcting a malignant situation in our community, and any ally I can get in that regard is more than welcome–especially one of the stature and potential power of a Barack Obama. That is, if we don’t blow it.
So this constant nitpicking, and sensitivity over our “image” is meaningless to me. It’s a distraction, and it’s preventing us from getting to the bottom line–the need to reassess our cultural mores.
One of the big problems that we have in our community is our preoccupation with image as oppose to substance. Instead of actually doing those things that will make us substantial and lead to a better life for our children, we tend to be satisfied with getting the Escalade and bling, that makes us look like we’re substantial. And instead of actually becoming a man, we’re satisfied to grow whiskers and simply passing for one.
The fact is, we’re phonies, and everybody seems to know it but us–that’s why we’re so sensitive. As my grandfather use to say–we strut around like millionaires, dressed sharper than everybody in town, and ain’t got a dime. He meant that as a metaphor for our overall character.
We’ve got to get away from that, because we have more than enough potential and creativity to save this planet. White people have come to recognize that, that’s why two of the most respected people on Earth is Colin Powell and Barack Obama, and the only person even half way respected in Bush’s administration is Condie Rice.
White people realize that there’s nothing more impressive on this Earth than a Black person that’s been dragged through the pits of hell, then come out the other side a well rounded and highly educated individual. In order to survive such an experience, by definition, you have to be special.
Again, White people realize that, that’s why they’re rallying around Obama. Even Sen. Robert Byrd, and old Grand Wizard of the Klansman. Yet, we’re so self-absorbed over our “image”, and the superficial, that we’re being caught a day late and a dollar short–yet, again. Think about the irony of it–White folks are saying, this Black man is who we need to get us out of this mess. Then here we are picking our teeth with an alfalfa stem, saying, “I don’t know, boss. He is a nigga, don’t forget–you think we can trust him?
So to be perfectly frank with you, Boyce, for some of us who endured the struggle and sacrifices of the sixties--the true militants who have a living memory of what we were initially fighting for, and who saw Obama being greeted like a rock star in places that greeted Martin with fire hoses, batons, and police dogs -- this situation is kinda embarrassing.
You see, we’ve been there done that--I remember when some Black people use to refer to Martin as Martin Luther Coon.
Eric
That's why black women don't get support from black men. When it came time for women to stand up and mention their brothers, fathers, uncles and others who have supported them, they chose to fall into the stereotypes. If you can't support us, then don't expect us to support you.
I'm sorry, good brother, but I can't agree with that position. Supporting your family is not a quid pro quo proposition. If you don't support 'em I have to--and I ain't did nothing to either one of you.
Wattree
Black women don't stand up for black men. They beat us up instead. They also don't take care of their kids, since many of them don't encourage their kids to be with their fathers. By the time the father gets to the kids, they've been poisoned against them. It's not all the man's fault.
Look at what's happening here. Everybody's talking about the poor Black man, and the mean Black women. What about the poor Black kids?
Suck it up, and pay your dues. It's not about you and your Ex--it's about your kids!
Wattree
You say just suck it up, be quiet and think about the kids? Black women were not thinking about the kids when they accepted Barack Obama's pandering and sympathy and nodded amen when he was whining about black men. Women should suck it up and care about the kids just like the men, but many are not doing that. They would rather have Obama tell them how weak black men are. Two people make babies, not just one. Stop blaming men for everything, it's one sided.
I have but one response to that: Where would the Black man be, if we had to depend on our father's to raise us? Many of us would have long since starved to death--and don't forget, it is primarily Black men introducing our children to drugs. But maybe I shouldn't even bring that up, because, after all, a brother's just trying to make a livin'.
Wattree
That is a good question. Why are black men so messed up? Partly because they were raised by their mothers. Mothers deserve some responsibility too.
Agreed.
Wattree
Post a Comment