Showing posts with label black voters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label black voters. Show all posts

Monday, November 3, 2008

Your Black Politics: Civil rights group renews Va. election lawsuit


RICHMOND, Va.—The NAACP on Friday resumed efforts to force Virginia to put more voting machines in minority polling places, setting up a court hearing 15 hours before voters head to polls in the battleground state.

The Virginia chapter of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's will return to federal court on Monday afternoon to argue the state is inadequately prepared to handle an enormous voter surge expected Tuesday.

State Republicans plan to oppose the NAACP's request on grounds that altering voting procedures on the eve of the election would be disruptive and could unfairly disadvantage their candidates.

Record turnout is expected as Democrat Barack Obama tries to win 13 electoral votes in state that has backed Republican presidential candidates since 1968. Obama would be the nation's first black president if elected.

The NAACP alleged the state failed to provide enough voting machines to handle the crowds, particularly in majority black precincts. The lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Richmond asked for paper ballots to be provided as one option if lines got too long.

More than 436,000 new voters registered since Jan. 1, a 10 percent increase that pushed voter rolls past 5 million for the first time in Virginia, a state of 7.7 million residents. Much of the increase results from the Obama campaign's aggressive registration drive.

At the close of the first fiercely contested presidential race in Virginia in generations, several polls show Obama slightly ahead.

Continued:

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Your Black World: Many Blacks Remain Sceptical Of Obama On Race

WASHINGTON (AFP) — Despite Barack Obama's message of change and hope, fears persist in the black community about what his election as president could mean for the legacy of racism in America.

Namely, that it might mean nothing at all.

"America is still one of the most segregated countries by race and by class in the industrialized world," said Dedrick Muhammad, research associate at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, a think tank for social justice.

Muhammad pointed to research showing that black Americans remain far behind the rest of the country economically, with median wealth one-tenth of that in white America, and one in three black children born into poverty.

Like most black Americans, Muhammad supports Obama's historic bid to become America's first black president.

However, he said the Illinois senator's campaign tactic of largely avoiding discussion of race in his campaign has "driven me crazy."

"What saddens me today is that we don't talk about black-white inequality," he said. "I see in Obama a winning strategy, but it is sad to me."

For the 47-year-old son of a white American mother and black Kenyan father to gain the lead he currently holds over his Republican rival John McCain, Obama has had to tip-toe around any potential racial controversy, analysts say.

"Obama has very carefully avoided discussing race except when he had to," said Gary Weaver, an author and professor of cross-cultural studies at American University, noting Obama made just one major policy address on race during the campaign.

"I think there genuinely are people who are afraid that somehow an African-American as president would destroy the purity of the country," he said.

But even Obama's relative silence has not muted the issue. Weaver pointed to numerous attempts by his opponents to raise the topic of race, some of them blatant, others covert.

"There are enough coded messages coming out from the Republican side," said Weaver, ranging from mentions of his "urban" agenda that contrast with images of mainly white rural America, to assertions of "socialism" in his economic policy that implicitly tie him to foreigners.

"These coded messages subtly get across the issue of race," said Weaver.

Despite America's attempts to move past racial prejudice, research has shown that racial bias lingers in the United States, 40 years after the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.

A recent study by San Diego State University and the University of Chicago on politics and racial attitudes suggested that "ethnicity and national identity may play a larger role than often realized in how political candidates are perceived."

"A black candidate is implicitly conceived of as being less American than a white candidate," it said.

Prominent African-Americans have said they understand Obama's need to keep the black community at arm's length in order to win.

But they say that kind of dance leaves many unanswered questions about Obama's commitment to black issues in terms of poverty, employment opportunities and substandard education, if he does win on November 4.

"To me it sounds more like the African-American community is a kind of hidden mistress. Everybody assumes an affair is going on but nobody is quite sure," said Joy Zarembka, author of "The Pigment of Your Imagination: Mixed Race in a Global Society."

Zarembka said the new emphasis by Obama supporters on the buzzword "post-racial" ignores the importance of the black community, and she is concerned that an Obama victory could eliminate policies that aim to give minorities a better chance at employment and education.

"I have great concerns about an affirmative action policy that moves forward in a race-neutral way," she said.

John Johnson, political action chair of the Virginia State conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), said he has heard those types of concerns, but believes Obama presents a new narrative on blacks in American society.

"There is an opportunity to uplift the race. The role model potential is outstanding," he said, adding that an Obama victory could have a wider effect on accepting diversity in America.

"I think it will have an impact on making all of America more comfortable with all Americans."

Lena Williams, 58, author of "It's the Little Things: Everyday Interactions That Anger, Annoy, and Divide the Races," said that when she volunteered for the Obama campaign, the younger and more enthusiastic supporters asked why she was so "mellow."

"America has a way of breaking your heart," she answered. "It makes you very cautious."

From AFP

Monday, October 27, 2008

Your Black World: Reports Of Voting Irregularities Receive Minimal Media Play

In several key states, voters are reporting of irregularities at the polling booth. Most voters are expressing concern with the electronic voting machine system. Worries of ballot-tampering are sweeping the progressive world, as early-voters share stories of machine malfunctioning. In Tennessee, a filmaker-couple reported of pushing a button to vote for Sen. Obama, but having the screen instead highlight Green Party Presidential nominee, Cynthia McKinney's name. McKinney, on Friday, condemned these occurrences and is asking for thorough investigations into the scathing reports. Could this be the Republican strategy: Blame Cynthia McKinney for Sen. Obama's loss?

Democracy Now! filed a report on these incidents:

PART 1:



PART 2:


Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Your Black World: Barack Obama, and the “Lawrence Summers Effect”


By: Tolu Olorunda


It's time to get right down to business. With Sen. Obama finalizing the acceptance of the Democratic Presidential Nomination should come a certain level of responsibility and accountability. Senator Obama descended upon the podium and aroused the audience with his endearing brand of inspiring and motivating speeches. The historicalness of this moment notwithstanding, I would urge the Illinois Senator to be wise and aware of the steps he, hereafter, takes in effort to clinch the presidency. It is no secret that the majority of white brothers and sisters are immensely uncomfortable with the idea of Barack Obama being affiliated with the other half of his DNA. If Sen. Obama is to walk a tight rope into victory, he would have to inevitably compromise certain values that magnetized the Black Youth/Hip-Hop vote toward his campaign initially. Chris Lightly, CEO of Violator Records/Management, recently wrote an interesting piece urging Sen. Obama not to "lower" his campaign to the base of the Hip-Hop generation -- if he intends to attain the highest height of the land: The presidency. Lightly struggled to articulate this perspective coherently, saying, "Don't lower yourself to speak to rappers! Just because you are African-American, don't allow the press to make you step down from the plate of being one of the most powerful men in the world to address a comment from a rapper, no matter how great he or she is. If the Dixie Chicks stand up and attack McCain, the press already knows it's almost worthless to ask him about it." While this idea might be portrayed as beneficial and advantageous on a certain scale, this could possibly rebound on the Obama Campaign and forfeit him the presidency. With the amount of clout amassed by KRS-One, Public Enemy, Dead-Prez, NYOIL, Amir Sulaiman, Lupe Fiasco, Mos-Def or Rhymefest, turning one's back on the Hip-Hop generation - for political expediency - will amount to the gift that keeps on giving. Hip-Hop culture - through some of its own self-indictment - is widely perceived as unworthy of critical-reflection or scholarly-engagement, but a failure to ascertain its significance can be costly, if not cancerous. This multi-billion dollar industry which has captivated the planet in an unprecedented manner is undoubtedly an agent of influence. Its wings are spread beyond the 4 corners of the world. If Sen. Obama is determined on being the 44th President of the United States, he would have to do a lot more than unveil his iPod Library.

In 2001, astute Scholar and Princeton Professor, Dr. Cornel West, was thrust into the spotlight of public debate; not due to his compelling mind, but a squabble with then-Harvard President, Lawrence Summers. The dispute seemingly stemmed from Larry Summer's disappointment in West's production of a rap CD, entitled "Sketches of My Culture." Lawrence Summers believed that Hip-Hop was a culture of embarrassment, and for West to be involved in the participation of a rap CD, alongside Hip-Hop artists, was an ultimate tarnishment of the Harvard legacy. With a story on the front page of the New York Times, this private quarrel soon became the talk of the town. Prof. West, as always, was rapid in responding to Summers’s callous mischaracterization of Black creativity. Michael Eric Dyson, Georgetown University Professor, also lamented this tragic tradition of the academia, which guards against the fusion of intellectualism with street-culture. In a 2007 conversation with TV Host, Tavis Smiley, Dyson concluded that "people in the academy are always suspicious of people who are able to speak beyond jargon, beyond obscure discourse and dialog and language, to say something meaningful in five minutes that somebody out there in the world can actually understand. I don't apologize for that." If Barack Obama is not careful, he would - if not already - fall victim to the demands made upon him by the dominant society, to disregard the humanity of Black and Brown youth, who aren't as enthused about his candidacy as their White neo-liberal counterparts.

Within the last few months, Sen. Obama has – consciously or subconsciously - informed his Black, Brown and Red supporters that he intends to be nonspecific in dealing with their concerns -- if at all their concerns would be dealt with. In his quest for a "United" America, Obama is pushing the lid on Black and Brown patience. Most Blacks don't see any benefit from a collective economic, social, cultural or educational uplift. They live in a society where Iraqi lives are openly deemed unequal to that of American lives. They watched the Natalie Holloway spectacle play out in dramatic fashion, at the expense of Tamika Huston. If Barack Obama is to seal the deal on his 90% African-American voting bloc, certain demands must be met. Whether the Obama campaign strategists are intelligent enough to dissect the complexity of the Black Community or not, Sen. Obama, having emerged from the well of the South-Side of Chicago, is deeply informed of the racial-intricacy that constitutes Black culture. Barack Obama must be guided against sending the wrong message to Black and Brown citizens. Refusing to defend the causes of the undermined and disempowered members of society, will not - and should not - be tolerated. Most Black voters are despondent as a result of the winded history of presidential hopefuls with compelling rhetoric, but unfulfilled promises. If they see a convincing investment in the McKinney/Clemente ticket, most of those voters would, at the drop of a hat, resist the temptation of being immersed in the sheer symbolism of history vis-à-vis an Obama presidency. If the perception that Obama is snubbing Muslim and Black voters is unchallenged for an extended amount of time, such an inference would yield risk of validation, and therefore, render some steep consequences.

The Obama campaign is going unrelentingly for gold, but risking disqualification. Barack Obama's frequent usage of the term "funny name" to describe the prescribed name giving by his father, "Barack Hussein Obama," is to be sure, unflattering to millions of Muslims around the world who see this caricature as a corrupted perception of their culture. Sen. Obama must make amends in the most applicable and practical way possible. It would leave an indelible stain on Black History, if the presidency of a Black Man is attained at the price of Black, Brown, Arab, and Native-American dignity. For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world, and forfeit his soul?

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Barack Obama's Journey Across the World




KABUL, Afghanistan - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama met Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul on Sunday, Reuters reported, the second day of a visit to Afghanistan that is meant to bolster the senator’s foreign policy credentials.

Obama has previously criticized Karzai, who has led Afghanistan since U.S.-led and Afghan forces toppled the hardline Islamist Taliban in 2001, but said the purpose of this trip was to listen rather than deliver strong messages.

Obama, part of a congressional delegation, was at the heavily guarded Afghan presidential palace in the capital Kabul and was having lunch with Karzai, a palace official said.

The Illinois senator will also visit Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and Britain on a foreign tour he hopes will help answer Republican criticism that he does not have the experience to be commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

Crticized Obama
Obama last week criticized Karzai in an interview with CNN.

“I think the Karzai government has not gotten out of the bunker and helped to organize Afghanistan, and the government, the judiciary, police forces, in ways that would give people confidence. So there are a lot of problems there,” he said.

Once the darling of the West, Karzai has come under increasing criticism at home and abroad for failing to take tough action to clamp down on rampant corruption, tackle former warlords and stamp out record-breaking drug production — all factors that feed the growing Taliban insurgency.

Click to Read More.

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Black Politics: Proof that Fox News Deliberately Lies

by Dr. Boyce Watkins
www.BoyceWatkins.net


Here is a before/after picture of what Fox News did to one of the people it that it attempted to villify on its network. Notice that the first image looks normal, and the second one looks like the guy should be starring in a horror film.

I know this first hand, since that is what I speculated Fox did to me. Last month, when Bill O'Reilly spent 5 days calling for me to be fired from Syracuse University (fortunately, Olbermann and others around the country backed me up and called Bill out for the liar he is), he consistently ran a picture of me that made me look like I was out of "Killer Negroes r Us". If Willy Horton and Flava Flav had a baby together, that would have been my picture.

I didn't think much of it, since I just thought that maybe I was actually that ugly. But many of my friends called and asked "Why do you look so crazy in that picture?" I couldn't tell them why. Even I never thought that Fox News would sink so low as to possibly photoshop a picture to make the villain look even more villainous than before.

Now we have evidence.

Working behind the scenes with Fox, I can tell you that they are, in my opinion, one of the dirtiest networks in the country. When I was booked for back-to-back appearance with Hannity & Colmes and Keith Olbermann, the producer from MSNBC asked me not to tell the Fox producer that they were booking me in the same studio. She said that there are times when the Fox producers will deliberately book the hour they don't need just to make sure that I cannot get onto Olbermann's show. Whether this is true or not, I'm not sure. But based on the other silly things Fox does, I wouldn't doubt it.

Perhaps rather than calling them Fox News, we should call them "Dirty Dog News" or "Fux News", or perhaps we should just call them "Old News", because their journalistic credibility is gone. It seems that Juan Williams is working for the right network after all.

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Black Politics: Barack Obama Plans Trip to Europe and Middle East

 

Obama plans to visit Europe, Mideast this summer

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama plans to visit the Middle East and Europe this summer, taking time off from campaigning in the United States in an effort to boost his foreign policy credentials.

Obama's campaign told The Associated Press the likely nominee will travel to Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and the United Kingdom. The Illinois senator also has said he intends to visit Iraq and Afghanistan this summer; his campaign would not say whether those stops would be part of the trip to the Mideast and Europe.

 

"This trip will be an important opportunity for me to assess the situation in countries that are critical to American national security, and to consult with some of our closest friends and allies about the common challenges we face," Obama said in a statement. "This will be an important opportunity to have an exchange of views with leaders in these countries about these and other issues that are critical to American national security — and global security — in the 21st century."

 

The campaign also would not disclose the dates of any of the plans in an attempt to protect Obama's security. Obama's campaign manager said this past week that Iraq and Afghanistan would be part of an official congressional trip. The other stops are part of a campaign-funded visit.

Click to read More

Friday, June 27, 2008

Dems Who Flipped On FISA Immunity See More Telecom Cash, By Chris Frates - CBS News

Dems Who Flipped On FISA Immunity See More Telecom Cash, By Chris Frates - CBS News

(The Politico)House Democrats who flipped their votes to support retroactive immunity for telecom companies in last week’s FISA bill took thousands of dollars more from phone companies than Democrats who consistently voted against legislation with an immunity provision, according to an analysis by MAPLight.org.

In March, the House passed an amendment that rejected retroactive immunity. But last week, 94 Democrats who supported the March amendment voted to support the compromise FISA legislation, which includes a provision that could let telecom companies that cooperated with the government’s warrantless electronic surveillance off the hook.

The 94 Democrats who changed their positions received on average $8,359 in contributions from Verizon, AT&T and Sprint from January, 2005, to March, 2008, according to the analysis by MAPLight, a nonpartisan organization that tracks the connection between campaign contributions and legislative outcomes.

Retroactive immunity could squash about 40 lawsuits pending against telecommunication companies that helped the government monitor the telecommunications traffic of Americans without warrants. The telecom industry has lobbied hard to insure that the provision is included in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act update Congress is currently considering.

Click to read more.

,,,,,

How Public Funding of Presidential Elections Works

How Does Public Funding Work?

To qualify for public funding, Presidential candidates and party convention committees must first meet various eligibility requirements, such as agreeing to limit campaign spending to a specified amount. Once the Federal Election Commission determines that eligibility requirements have been met, it certifies the amount of public funds to which the candidate or convention committee is entitled. The U.S. Treasury then makes the actual payments from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. This fund consists of dollars voluntarily checked off by taxpayers on their federal income tax returns. (In 1993, the taxpayer checkoff was increased from $1 to $3. Public Law 103-66) The checkoff neither increases the amount of taxes owed nor decreases any refund due for the tax year in which the checkoff is made.

Primary Matching Funds

Partial public funding is available to Presidential primary candidates in the form of matching payments. The federal government will match up to $250 of an individual's total contributions to an eligible candidate.

Only candidates seeking nomination by a political party to the office of President are eligible to receive primary matching funds. In addition, a candidate must establish eligibility by showing broad-based public support. He or she must raise in excess of $5,000 in each of at least 20 states (i.e., over $100,000). Although an individual may contribute up to $2,300 to a primary candidate, only a maximum of $250 per individual applies toward the $5,000 threshold in each state.

Candidates also must agree to:

  • Limit campaign spending for all primary elections to $10 million plus a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA).6 This is called the national spending limit.
  • Limit campaign spending in each state to $200,000 plus COLA, or to a specified amount based on the number of voting age individuals in the state (plus COLA), whichever is greater.
  • Limit spending from personal funds to $50,000.

The campaign finance law exempts the payment of some expenses from the spending limits. Certain fundraising expenses (up to 20 percent of the expenditure limit) and legal and accounting expenses incurred solely to ensure the campaign's compliance with the law do not count against the expenditure limits.

Once they have established eligibility for matching payments, Presidential candidates may receive public funds to match contributions from individual contributors, up to $250 per individual. The contributions must be in the form of a check or money order. (Purchases of tickets to fundraisers and contributions collected through joint fundraising are matchable contributions, but loans, cash contributions, goods or services, contributions from political committees and contributions which are illegal under the campaign finance law are not matchable.)

Even if they no longer campaign actively in primary elections, candidates may continue to request public funds to pay off campaign debts until late February or early March of the year following an election. (However, to qualify for matching funds, contributions must be deposited in the campaign account by December 31 of the election year.) Eligible candidates may receive public funds equaling up to half of the national spending limit for the primary campaign. Because candidates receive many nonmatchable contributions, such as those from political committees, they generally raise more money than they receive in matching funds.

To see the 2008 Presidential Candidate Matching Fund Submission Dates, click here.

General Election Funding

The Presidential nominee of each major party may become eligible for a public grant of $20 million (plus a cost-of-living adjustment) for campaigning in the general election.7 To be eligible to receive the public funds, the candidate must limit spending to the amount of the grant and may not accept private contributions for the campaign. Private contributions may, however, be accepted for a special account maintained exclusively to pay for legal and accounting expenses associated with complying with the campaign finance law. These legal and accounting expenses are not subject to the expenditure limit.

In addition, candidates may spend up to $50,000 from their own personal funds. Such spending does not count against the expenditure limit.

Minor party candidates and new party candidates may become eligible for partial public funding of their general election campaigns. (A minor party candidate is the nominee of a party whose candidate received between 5 and 25 percent of the total popular vote in the preceding Presidential election. A new party candidate is the nominee of a party that is neither a major party nor a minor party.) The amount of public funding to which a minor party candidate is entitled is based on the ratio of the party's popular vote in the preceding Presidential election to the average popular vote of the two major party candidates in that election. A new party candidate receives partial public funding after the election if he/she receives 5 percent or more of the vote. The entitlement is based on the ratio of the new party candidate's popular vote in the current election to the average popular vote of the two major party candidates in the election.

Although minor and new party candidates may supplement public funds with private contributions and may exempt some fundraising costs from their expenditure limit, they are otherwise subject to the same spending limit and other requirements that apply to major party candidates.

Click to read more.

OBAMA IS TURNING THIS DREAM INTO A NIGHTMARE

BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

OBAMA IS TURNING THIS DREAM INTO A NIGHTMARE

Eric,

I found your response over the top – emotional and unrealistic. Who would respond to such a challenge, do as I say or I won't send you any money and start my own grass roots organization.

Please,

for the first time in our history, we have a candidate who both embraces our people and is fit to lead the entire nation in a world on the brink of collapse. Of course he's a politician. Against his own best interests, that is his chosen profession and it is one of compromise, negotiation and deft balletic performance in a 24 hour news cycle. He will make mistakes and always disappoint somebody, but is that any reason to jump ship?

Before Obama, the concept of "grass roots" was not even in the national lexicon. He has already performed heroic feats by winning the nomination, energizing the electorate, expanding the map and mounting a movement that is prepared to eject the Republicans whose ideology and machinery has done so much damage worldwide. As a journalist, you have power and influence and I would hope an unconditional love for a brother who has welcomed support from those like you and me, building a movement from the bottom up.

His task is to galvanize a nation sorely in need of change, and everybody having a hissy fit on the brink of history in the making, from disgruntled Hillary supporters, neglected Muslims, rampaging preachers and astute journalists needs to have the courage, the hopefulness and the faith that this magical moment is ours for the taking and this man is the vessel of dreams deferred.

The transition will be painful, but that's the nature of rebirth. Take a breath and chill out. FISA ain't done yet. We'll have time over the next 8 years to hold Obama accountable, but now is the time to believe in our power to do so. Resist the urge to divide and be conquered. Most important: get that brother in the White House period.

Mamie--Louise,

I'm sure you know I understand the argument that you're putting forth-- I've been making it to disaffected Black people since the day Obama declared. But we're talking about the fourth amendment of the Constitution here! If this man was going to compromise for the sake of politics, surely he could have found an area of less importance than that.

In addition, he has undermined the very foundation of his candidacy--change. And beyond even that, by supporting a bill that gives immunity to the communication companies and the people in the Bush administration who violated our fourth amendment rights, he's also blocking litigation that allows us to find out whose communications they monitored, the information they gathered, and for what purpose. And there are also indications that this situation goes much deeper than 9/11, since the monitoring started before 9/11.

If this situation had happened during the sixties or seventies, all hell would be breaking lose. Bush, and many in his administration would have been impeached, and others would be going to jail. We're taking it far too lightly because we've become undereducated over the years, and desensitized to the loss of our constitutional rights. And the horrible part of it all is that Barack knows this. He's not a dummie--the man is a constitutional scholar!

They started chipping away at the constitution when Ford pardoned Nixon. Then they went a little further and got away with it when Reagan was not impeached after Iran/contra and flooded the Black community with drugs to finance his illegal war in contravention of the Boland Amendment. Now they're refusing to address the lie that Bush told to take us into Iraq, killing hundreds of thousands of people, and allowed his cronies to ravish the treasury, and take away our right to due process. Now this brother comes along talking about change, and then supports blocking an opportunity to investigate their spying on millions of Americans. Exactly what does the brother have to do before I have permission to get pissed?

There's something very esoteric and ugly about this situation, and I don't like it. Of course, I have no choice but to vote for the man, considering my alternative, but I am going to close my checkbook and hold my nose while I do it.

I'm not a groupie. I support politicians, only, as long as they support my best interest--and with this issue, this very important issue, Barack didn't do that. So again, while I am going to vote for him--although while holding my nose--from this point forward, I'm going to watch him like a hawk, and scream bloody murder every time he farts in the wrong direction. If I don't, I'm no better than the hacks who are giving Bush a pass.

So, over the top, I don't think so. The mere fact that we have a constitution represents a message being sent by the founding fathers from beyond the grave: "Don't trust any of 'em"--Black or White. And I'll never forget that in the future.

The next superstar that gets a dime from me is gonna have to be able to tap dance.

Eric



Stay on top of what's going on around you. From Hip Hop to world and national news--stay informed about those things that impact both the Black community and the entire world, as interpreted by Dr. Boyce Watkins and some of the nation's top Black writers. Stay in touch with Your Black World www.yourblackworld.com/. It's our piece of the net.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

BLACK STAR NEWS

BLACK STAR NEWS

I am very happy to announce that in addition to my association with YourBlackWorld, and the Los Angeles Sentinel, I am also beginning an association as a featured columnist with Black Star News (http://blackstarnews.com/).

I don't see this as just another job offer. I'm very excited to be associated with this organization because the publisher, Milton Allimadi, and his associates at Black Star News are serious journalist, involved in world class journalism.

Allimadi received his journalistic training at the Graduate School of Journalism at Columbia University. After stints at The Journal of Commerce and The Wall Street Journal, Allimadi reported for the New York Times as a metro news stringer. At the New York Times Allimadi honed, among other things, his reportorial skills. Allimadi's passion for community-based and investigative news reporting took him to the legendary City Sun newspaper, an African American weekly newspaper published by the late Andy Cooper, who served as Allimadi's mentor. As an editor of The City Sun, Allimadi exposed corruption, police brutality and thereby developed a reputation as a hard-nosed editor and reporter. In late 1996 The City Sun shut down as a result of Cooper's failing health.

In 1997, Allimadi founded The Black Star News with his savings and those of then partners Ben Otunu and Mana Kasongo; he obtained financial support from Bill and Camille Cosby. Today, The Black Star News is a renowned investigative newspaper. Following its motto of "Speaking Truth to Empower," The Black Star News has scored several major news scoops which has garnered for it several awards from the Independent Press Association and national media coverage, including from CNN financial news, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, New York Press, The New York Daily News, The New York Post, The New York Observer, New York magazine, The Village Voice, The Washington Times, and Brill's Content Magazine.

During this time in our history when creditable journalism seems to be at its lowest ebb, I am thrilled to have this opportunity to be associated with a group of journalist who are dedicated to keeping the fires lit within the fourth estate. With all of the nation's news now being controlled by corporate interests, it will fall to journalists such as these to keep America informed.

Eric L. Wattree

wattree.blogspot.com



Stay on top of what's going on around you. From Hip Hop to world and national news--stay informed about those things that impact both the Black community and the entire world, as interpreted by Dr. Boyce Watkins and some of the nation's top Black writers. Stay in touch with Your Black World www.yourblackworld.com/. It's our piece of the net.

Monday, June 23, 2008

Do white conservatives care about black people?

By John Eidson

My wife and I have friends who are not hurting financially, but by no means are they in the same league as Bill Clinton. They live in a 2,000 square foot house, drive inexpensive cars, wear inexpensive clothes and eat at inexpensive restaurants. They also are white southern Baptists and conservative Republicans. From the way such people are portrayed by some politicians and journalists, you might think they are hostile toward the well-being of blacks. If you might think that, you would be wrong.

Coast for Christ Baptist Ministries is a non-profit organization that helps residents of fishing communities along a 200 mile stretch of coastline in Ghana, West Africa. With few jobs, widespread disease and rampant poverty, most of the people who live there struggle mightily just to get from one day to the next.

In addition to substantial charitable giving to their church, our friends personally bought a $10,000 fishing boat for a coastal village in Ghana, and paid to send a young black woman to medical school. And that is not all they have done in reaching literally across the ocean to help those in need who happen to be people of color.

You might be asking yourself why they don’t help blacks in this country. The answer is they do, because their charity towards black people is not limited to those in faraway lands. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, they and other members of their predominately white and overwhelmingly Republican church traveled at their own expense to the Gulf Coast, where they stayed for three weeks helping storm victims without regard to skin color.

Our friends are not alone. Despite claims to the contrary, particularly at election time, most conservative Republicans have nothing but good will for their fellow citizens whose ancestors were brought here as slaves. Are there some who don’t? Unfortunately, yes. But the same is true of some Democrats, as was proven during the primary season where many Democrats voted against Barack Obama simply because he is black.

So, if white conservatives actually do care about black people, why do so many of them vote for Republicans? The answer is they believe in conservative alternatives to the failed welfare programs that are largely responsible for the tragic conditions in much of urban America. Bill Cosby put it best when he observed that “welfare kills the human spirit”

When blacks are ready to look for new solutions, they will find that white conservatives are eager to help.

John Eidson is a white conservative who takes great pleasure in black success.

Sunday, June 22, 2008

One For Boomer



ONE FOR BOOMER

Receding hairline, failing vision,
Hair now turning grey,
An aging boomer in final protest,
Father Time his cause this day.

He donned his headband, his tie-dyed jeans,
His scorched draft card from protests past,
Then set out for one last battle--
To find his youth
That had quietly passed.

But he found no placards, no lively speeches,
No angry taunts and shouts;
No pretty girls wearing mini skirts,
Passing flowers all about.

All he found was a new America,
And more freedom across this land;
He found a kid demanding equality for women,
And also his fellow man.
He found Martin, Chavez, and Malcolm,
Standing by his side;
He found Thomas Jefferson
And all his forefathers
Beaming down with pride;
He found minority children across this land
Whose reach now exceed their grasp;
He found Jim Crow angrily cursing him,
As he took his final gasp.

He found pride as an aging boomer,
More hero, than common man;
He found a quirky old fart embraced by history,
For having the courage to take a stand.

Eric Wattree



Stay on top of what's going on around you. From Hip Hop to world and national news--stay informed about those things that impact both the Black community and the entire world, as interpreted by Dr. Boyce Watkins and some of the nation's top Black writers. Stay in touch with Your Black World www.yourblackworld.com/. It's our piece of the net.

THE MODERN BLACK MAN: 21ST CENTURY ARGUMENTS FOR 19TH CENTURY THINKING

BENEATH THE SPIN * ERIC L. WATTREE

THE MODERN BLACK MAN:

21ST CENTURY ARGUMENTS FOR 19TH CENTURY THINKING

Less than three hours after Barack Obama declared his candidacy for presidency, the feeding frenzy began among Black people. It just so happened that Sen. Obama declared his candidacy on the same day as Tavis Smiley's "State of Black America" national broadcast, and many had the audacity to criticize him for not putting off this historic event so he could appear on Tavis' broadcast. And during the broadcast--again, on this historic occasion–Dr. Cornel West of Harvard University ranted on national television that the Black community should be asking Obama, "How deep is your love for your people" and "Where is your money coming from?" He indicated that Barack didn't put this historic event off to appear on Tavis' broadcast because he had people talking to him that didn't warrant our trust. And as he was saying these things, Tavis was standing there grinning like a chess cat, prowling a South Georgia cotton field.

That was the moment that Barack Obama got my unwavering support. It was at that very moment that I decided that this man was going to get my vote--and if that vote was wasted, as many suggested it would be at the time, so be it. Because it was on that day, and at that very moment, that I fully recognized the depth of our self-loathing, and the psychological corruption of my people.

Later on that day I wrote, "as African Americans we are the product of a racist society–and not just any racist society, but a society that is more efficient in producing subtle racists than any other society that has ever existed on the face of this Earth. Due to the necessity of America's need to subjugate Black people, while at the same time, live up to the hypocrisy of our "All men are created equal" credo, a form of racism has spontaneously evolved that is so subtle that even Black people have become racist against themselves–and amazingly, without even knowing it. As a direct result, Black people in America hate other Black people just as profoundly, and even more violently, than the most virulent White racist in the South. Clear evidence of that is the fact that of the thousands of homicides committed against Blacks every year, not one perpetrator was reported to have been wearing a sheet."

I continue to hold that belief, and it's been continually reinforced throughout this election. It seems to me that the only difference between the modern Black man and the 19th century Black man, who shuffled about more interested in the master's welfare than his own, is the sophistication of his argument.

Today, instead of simply saying that we can't trust him because he's Black, we say, "The people talking to him don't warrant our trust." And today, instead of saying, "No Black man has sense enough to run this plantation", we say, "He lacks experience."

The situation is such that it's not safe for this brother to open his mouth without somebody parsing every comma, trying to find something to criticize–and when they can't find anything, they speculate about what he might have meant, or second guess what he should have said, or question his motives.

On father's Day Barack spoke at the Apostolic Church of God, a predominately Black church in Chicago, Il. During his speech he discussed the need for man young Black men to step up to the plate and become better fathers. He pointed out that children who grow up without a father in the home are five times more likely to grow up in poverty, nine time more likely to drop out of school, and twenty times more likely to end up in prison. He also spoke of his own experience without a father. He recalled seeing how embarrassed his mother was to have to go to the market with food stamps in order to feed the family, and the pain she suffered when she couldn't get him some of the things that other children had. He also spoke of the epidemic of children killing children in the black community, and asked, "How many are we willing to lose?"

Believe it or not, there were many in the Black community who took serious issue with that speech. Even Dr. Boyce Watkins, one of this nation's most prominent scholars (note that I didn't limit it to "Black scholar"), a brother that I consider a friend, and I highly respect, took issue. He asked, "why he waited to speak at a predominantly black church to give the message only to black parents?"

My response to Dr. Watkins was, had Senator Obama gone to a predominantly white forum to criticize black fatherhood, there might have been some validity to the argument that it was inappropriate, but that was far from the case. First, it wasn't black fatherhood he was criticizing. In fact, he took the time to commend those black fathers who had stepped up to the plate. He also went out of his way to praise his wife's father, who in spite of a severe disability that required him to get up an hour earlier than most people just to get to work on time, he managed to step up to the plate and bring the type of excellence to his parental responsibility that allowed him to raise two well rounded and successful children. So he wasn't criticizing black fatherhood at all–on the contrary, he was encouraging those being less than responsible to rethink their way of life.

And as for the propriety of addressing this issue in a predominantly black forum, I don't understand the objection. He told the truth, in a black setting, as a black man who grew up without a father. Who better to speak to an issue that needs so badly to be addressed in the black community than one of the most prominent figures in the community? And what would be a more appropriate place to deliver such a message than in a black church, and among black people? It seems to me that a good case could have been made that he would have been remiss not to have given such a speech.

We often talk about the courage to speak truth to power. That's exactly what Sen. Obama demonstrated. He's not a stupid man –he remembers the backlash that came down on Bill Cosby for broaching this very same subject. And even Rev. Al Sharpton said he was taking a big chance. Yet, in spite of the fact that he desperately needs black support to win the presidency, he decided that it was so important to delivered this message to his people that he was willing to take the chance on losing that support. That is the true meaning of speaking truth to power.

The brother should be applauded instead of criticized, and I think he would have been if it were not for a latent undercurrent of hatred and distrust of Black people--but ironically, this time it's among ourselves.

Eric L. Wattree

wattree.blogspot.com



Stay on top of what's going on around you. From Hip Hop to world and national news--stay informed about those things that impact both the Black community and the entire world, as interpreted by Dr. Boyce Watkins and some of the nation's top Black writers. Stay in touch with Your Black World www.yourblackworld.com/. It's our piece of the net.

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Catering to the Right Wing: Barack Obama's DLC strategy

by Black Agenda Report Managing Editor Bruce Dixon

"In the DLC playbook, the road to winning elections is appealing to Republican-leaning white voters "

Back in 2003, when Obama was a candidate for the US Senate in the Illinois Democratic primary this reporter and Glen Ford challenged him on the fact of his affiliation with the Democratic Leadership Council. The right-wing, corporate-funded Trojan Horse inside the Democratic party had fervently embraced his political career, naming him one of its "100 to Watch" for 2003.

DLC endorsement is the gold standard of political reliability for Wall Street, Big Energy, Big Pharma, insurance, the airlines and more. Though candidates normally undergo extensive questioning and interviews before DLC endorsement, Obama insisted the blessing of these corporate special interests had been bestowed on him without these formalities and without his advance knowledge, and formally disassociated himself from the DLC. But like Hillary Clinton, and every front running Democrat since Michale Dukakis in 1988, Barack Obama's campaign has adopted the classic right wing DLC strategy.

In the DLC playbook, the road to winning elections is appealing to Republican-leaning white voters - demographic groups which pollsters and consultants in previous elections called "suburban soccer moms", NASCAR dads," and before that "Reagan Democrats." Candidates do this by decrying excessive partisanship, embracing "free trade" and "conservative" values, and displays of public piety, Though Obama has no formal ties with the DLC he has assiduously followed this prescription. Till a month ago Obama led every candidate among white men, an unprecedented achievement for a Democrat.

But after less than a month of sustained and often racist attacks from the likes of Fox News, CNN, Republican pundits and Hillary Clinton supporters, Obama's support among Republican-leaning white voters has sharply eroded. Dr. Adolph Reed, a black professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania explained why an April 30 Democracy Now interview,

"...Obama opened himself to this by leaning to-on the premise that he can appeal to Republicans and to conservatives and by parading his personal faith around. And frankly-this is, I guess, the crux of my argument in The Progressive column-that this is precisely the tactic that has been the undoing of every Democratic candidate since Dukakis, and I would frankly even include (Bill) Clinton in that, were it not for the fact that Ross Perot siphoned votes away from the Republicans each time. I mean, this is what happened with Gore in 2000, it's what happened with Kerry in 2004. You present yourself as electable because you can appeal to conservative voters, and then the Republicans attack you for not being a true conservative and can characterize you as someone who's trying to put something over on the American people.

It worked for a while. Barack Obama followed the DLC script to the letter for the last two years, publicly scolding Democrats for their insufficient piety, liberally borrowing from Republican talking points. He advertised himself as grounded by his personal relationship with Jesus, and by the faith tradition of the Black Church. But after Obama's Philadelphia speech on race, in which he characterized his pastor as a crazy old uncle stuck in the fifties and sixties, the Black Church was compelled to speak for itself. Rev. Jeremiah Wright, retiring pastor at Trinity UCC made a series of speeches and appearances in which he likened US Marines to Roman soldiers, described hundreds of US bases around the world as "empire" before the National Press Club, and refused to retreat from the contention that 9-11 was a preventable consequence of US foreign policy.

To preserve his support among whites which Obama won without challenging any of their fundamental beliefs about America, empire, Obama was forced to denounce his pastor's words as "akin to hate speech" and disavow his church, and with it the prophetic tradition of Christianity and the Black Church in particular. But this, and joining a prosperity-Gospel mega-church will not be enough. From this point on, all Republicans have to do is prove to their base that Obama is not as conservative as he once appeared, which they will do by pointing to his pastor and the prophetic tradition of the Black Church in general. They can, in fact, point to any stirrings of black or grassroots outrage or militancy anywhere, which Obama will want to ignore anyway, and demand a ringing denunciation from Barack Obama. When Obama gets his way, he will be silent, sticking to content-free appeals to "unity". And when Republicans prevail they will force him to denounce at every turn the grassroots activists he should be supporting.

By contrast, the 1984 and 1988 presidential campaigns of Rev. Jesse Jackson won white support too, but embraced the burden of challenging white American assumptions about the essential goodness of America, about empire, and race and class. If you were organizing against police brutality or farm foreclosures, organizing a union or protesting the illegal war in Central America, the campaign in many cases came to you and augmented your local efforts. The Obama must campaign avoid this kind of activism like Dracula avoids crosses, because its candidate's appeal is based on challenging none of the fake history, none of the racism, injustice and unearned privilege at the heart of American life.

The Jackson campaign, at least, was honest about the obstacles to a real politics of transformation in America.

For the 21st century's first black presidential candidate, "change" is to be accomplished through a content-free sort of "unity". Again, Dr. Reed helps us understand what is happening.

"...the contention that the candidate can bring us all together despite our partisan differences is the same thing that the Democrats have been claiming consistently since at least, you know, Dukakis, to be post-partisan, to be post-political. And frankly, I think it appeals-it's an appeal that gets greatest traction among people who want to take politics out of politics..."

Taking the politics out of politics, and out of black politics in particular is what Barack Obama must do to carry out his DLC strategy and retain his white base without teaching them anything they don't want to know. When the NYC police officers who pumped 51 bullets into an unarmed man and a hail of bullets into adjacent homes and a transit station were exonerated, Barack Obama could not bring himself to suggest that black life ought to be respected, that police officers should obey the law, that an Obama Justice Department would look carefully at this kind of thing, or even to feign concern for the victims and their families. His only comments where that we were "a nation of laws" and that we should "respect the verdict". When 25,000 longshoremen on the US West Coast staged a one-day strike on May 1 against the war in Iraq, the Obama campaign said nothing about the power of people standing together to "bring change". When US warplanes, which fire missiles and drop bombs almost daily over oil-rich Somalia killed 15 civilians last week, Obama was silent, despite having traveled in the region as recently as last year.

When he does speak, it won't be good news. Republicans are sure to escalate their demands, insisting that Barack Obama denounce a list of black and progressive organizations, activities, beliefs and individuals to retain his share of their base. And as long as Obama is wedded to the DLC strategy, he will eagerly comply.

If there was an actual mass-based progressive movement in the US, operating on the ground and independent of political parties and campaigns, it might have a prayer of holding Barack Obama accountable. But there isn't.

----
Bruce Dixon is Managing Editor at Black Agenda Report, and can be reached at bruce.dixon(at)blackagendareport.com

Friday, June 20, 2008

A RETROSPECTIVE

BENEATH THE SPIN * ERIC L. WATTREE

A RETROSPECTIVE:

IS OBAMA BLACK ENOUGH TO WARRANT AFRICAN-AMERICAN SUPPORT?
(Since this writing Dr. West has become a Sen. Obama advisor)

At this writing, it has been less than three hours since Senator Barack Obama has declared his candidacy for President of the United States of America, and already the feeding frenzy has begun. Just once I'd like to see Black people come together without reverting to the old "crabs in a barrel" syndrome. Just once I'd like see Black people come together and say, yes, he is Black, and Black is good. But we just can't seem to bring ourselves to do that–and the sad part about it is that we've never stopped to examine the reason why.

The fact is, as African Americans we are the product of a racist society–and not just any racist society, but a society that is more efficient in producing subtle racists than any other society that has ever existed on the face of this Earth. Due to the necessity of America's need to subjugate Black people, while at the same time, live up to the hypocrisy of our "All men are created equal" credo, a form of racism has spontaneously evolved that is so subtle that even Black people have become racist against themselves–and amazingly, without even knowing it. As a direct result, Black people in America hate other Black people just as profoundly, and even more violently, than the most virulent White racist in the South. Clear evidence of that is the fact that of the thousands of homicides committed against Blacks every year, not one perpetrator was reported to have been wearing a sheet.


While I've been aware of this fact for sometime now, I've been suffering under the illusion that it was also recognized by our most learned thinkers. So I was shocked beyond belief to hear the comments made by the eminent Black, Harvard professor, Dr. Cornel West at The State of Black America Conference held literally two hours after Senator Barack Obama declared his candidacy for president. During this Black History Month, and at a time when Black people across this country should have been wiping away tears at the very irony of the first viable Black presidential hopeful declaring his intention to run, while standing in the very shadow of the state house for which Lincoln served in the legislature, Dr. Cornel West ranted on national television that the Black community's questions for Senator Obama should be, "How deep is your love for your people" and Where is your money coming from?" In spite of Dr. West's reputation as an eminent Black scholar, in all of my years of observing the political environment, I have never heard a more silly, self-serving, and ill-advised assault on the collective interest of Black people as a whole.

In respectful deference to the sensitivities of a growing number of Black people over the use of the n-word, I've been trying desperately not to use it. But as I watched that gross act of stupidity being broadcasted across America, it only reinforced my fervent belief that words are simply tools, and from time to time there comes a need for every tool in the box–and that was surely one such time. I previously considered Dr.West one of the premier intellectuals in the world today–young, Black, accomplished, and brilliant. But after hearing that brother make such an inane, ill-considered, and yes, racist comment at the very worst possible moment in the history of this country, it makes me wonder if all of the hype over his supposed intellectual prowess, just that–hype. One would think that any Black man of even average intelligence, would know by instinct, not to denigrate such an important moment in Black history.

Now, I'm certain that a brother as well read, and has as many obscure facts at his command as Professor West, would probably mop the floor in political debate with an average brother like myself–after all, knowledge is indeed power. Yet, he's demonstrated once again, that wit without wisdom is a waste. His words brought to mind words stated by another group of Black people--a group who were far less educated, but obviously endowed with far more wisdom. Those were the words of our Black elders that went something like this–"Beware of educated fools." His words also reminded me of words that my grandfather said to me when I first enrolled into college. He told me, "Education is a very good thing–as long as you don't let them educate away your good, common sense." I didn't understand the wisdom of those words back then, but all of a sudden, they've taken on a new, and much more profound meaning.

Doesn't Dr. West–OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY–with all of his political sophistication recognize that before you can do anything for anyone, YOU MUST BE ELECTED FIRST. And what does he think would be Senator Obama's chances of being elected if he comes right out of the box talking about what he's going to do for Black people. Dr. West has obviously confused the senator with Rev. Al Sharpton, and his instincts would send the senator's candidacy in the same direction. One of the reasons that Senator Obama is so popular across all racial, political, social, generational, and economic strata of the American people is because he has positioned oftlinehimself as a candidate who wants to promote the welfare of ALL the people. So the very worst thing that he can possibly do is to go around from venue to venue asking, "Am I Black enough for you?" Surely the good doctor has the political sophistication to understand that.

Further, I didn't hear Dr. West asking any of the other politicians–and quite a few have declared–where their money was coming from. It takes multi-millions of dollars to run for president of the United States, so in order for Obama to run a successful campaign he's going to have to raise money from a multitude of sources, as will all the other candidates. Many of those sources from which all of the candidates receive money are going to raise questions, simply because all of the people and corporations in a position to give away that kind of money, all have a vested interest. But that's not Senator Obama's fault, that's the way the game is played. So if Dr. West doesn't like the way the game is played, he should question the system, not the senator. I don't know what their values are up there at Harvard University (they won't even let me through the gate), but down here at South West Los Angeles City College, we have the wisdom to recognize that you don't hate the player, you hate the game. But of course, the very best alternative would be for Dr. West to give the senator the money to run out of his own pocket–but then, if he's willing to dog the most viable Black candidate for president in the history of this country for a simple sound bite, he'd probably want something out of it too.pard fs32

So the writing is on the wall, and there's one thing for sure–if Senator Obama manages to get past his own people, he can't help but become the greatest president that this country has ever known. But I guess it all comes with the territory. What pains me, however, is that White people are beginning to see our value, before we can see our own. Many White people are managing to move forward, while we still have mud in our eyes. Wouldn't it be ironic if Black people turn out to be the last Black haters in America? I can just see it now–we'd have to stage a march on Harlem.

But the only thing that gives me hope in that regard, is to see how the seed that Dr. King, Ralph Abernathy, Thurgood Marshall, and the other insightful thinkers of the last generation has taken root. They had the insight to plant a seed that has begun to flourish–in spit of our current leaders. It's not those so-called Black leaders that we always see running their mouths on television that's changing America's perception towards Black people–on the contrary, if anything, they've delayed the process. What's changing America's perception towards blacks are people just like you, the reader–the everyday, hard working Black person. America has been watching the competence, integrity, creativity, and in many cases, brilliance, that you have been quietly bringing to your jobs on a daily basis. You don't hear them, and you're so busy that you're probably not even paying attention, but when they're alone they're saying, "Did you see how easily she handled that?" And at other times they find themselves saying out loud, "Don't worry about it–William will be back tomorrow, and he'll know how to handle it." Those are the perceptions that's changing America–one person at a time.

What these so-called Black leaders fail to understand is that you can change the laws over night, but perceptions don't change nearly as rapidly. They can give speeches with their little witty turn of phrases until their tongues fall out, but perceptions that have been taken for granted and inbred over hundreds of years do not change that easily. It took the competence, and very often excellence, that millions of everyday Black people brought to the table and demonstrated over the years that has given America the confidence that Barack Obama, this young Black man, is capable of leading this nation. You've done this–one workplace, one incident, one person at a time. So, it is you–the James Barnetts, the Eugene Jeffries, the Sheron Knights, and Joann Snows--that have placed Barack Obama in the position he is in today, and you shouldn't tolerate anyone, Black or White, who seeks to derail what you have accomplished.

Frankly, I had every intention of supporting Hillary Clinton in the coming election. I like both Bill and Hillary, but not as much as I like you. For that reason, I now feel obliged to support this young, Black man. Not only because he oozes an air of competence, honesty, and high moral character, but because every vote that America casts for him, is nothing less than a vote of America's confidence in you. For as Senator Barack Obama stood to declare his candidacy for the president of the United States of America, in the shadow of a state house that once smiled upon Lincoln, he stood drenched in the pride of this nation's forefathers, as the walking, breathing personification of Martin's dream, the dreams of a million slaves, and the fulfillment of this nation's promise, to Americans yet unborn.

Eric L. Wattree, Sr.




Stay on top of what's going on around you. From Hip Hop to world and national news--stay informed about those things that impact both the Black community and the entire world, as interpreted by Dr. Boyce Watkins and some of the nation's top Black writers. Stay in touch with Your Black World www.yourblackworld.com/. It's our piece of the net.

Hell No Don't Go To Iraq - My Open Letter To Senator and Mrs. Barack Obama




I love and support you Senator Barack Obama. You have exhibited sound judgment before the war in Iraq and during this historic campaign season. Senator you have announced to the world that our troops are coming home; that the unlimited and non-ending dollars are going to end when you become President of the United States of America. Now John McCain is demanding that you travel to Iraq. Please trust your first response to a trip to Iraq. This whole notion of a trip to Iraq is indeed a political ploy by desperate people that will do “ANYTHING” to win this election.

Mrs. Obama I admired your courage. After hearing you discuss the dread possibilities that your wonderful husband may encounter I took comfort in the fact that you are not "afraid." That you are not living your life fearful of the fact that based on our political history your husband personal safety is at a great risk.

I must admit that I am “afraid” for Senator Obama. My fears are based on the recent events of Huckabees' "joke", the Fox News personality’s comment, and Hillary's misspoken comments on Robert Kennedy’s assassination.

Two recent world political events that also make me fearful for Senator Obama’s safety are Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto assassination and the poisoning of Alexander Litvinoenko, a former Russian KGB operative in 2007.

Senator Obama Three Self-Explanatory Reasons That You Should Not Go To Iraq:


1. Blackwater USA is one of three United States-based security firms contracted by the State Department to provide security for diplomats and other senior civilians in Iraq. According to the New York Times, Blackwater guards the most prominent American diplomats. The NY Times also reported that Blackwater has received government contract worth more than 1 billion dollars since 2002.


2. Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto assassination occurred in December 2007 as she was campaigning ahead of the January 8, 2008, scheduled elections. President Pervez Musharraf’s government was responsible for Bhutto’s safety and security. According to one of Robert Novak’s columns, "the assassination of Benazir Bhutto followed two months of urgent pleas to the State Department by her representatives for better protection. The U.S. reaction was that she was worried over nothing, expressing assurance that Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf would not let anything happen to her."


3. Baghdad is one of the most dangerous place in the world. A place so dangerous that even when President George Bush and/or Vice President Cheney go to Iraq they violate Iraq’s airspace and arrive unannounced. They arrive unannounced because they fear that the Iraq government and police will betray them and have them killed. Think about this for a second, if Bush is afraid that he will be killed in Iraq after spending and giving hundreds of billions of dollars to that country how safe would Senator Obama be in Iraq?


Senator Obama, I like many of your supporters would love to have you as our President. The only thing that would make me happier than you becoming President Obama would be for you to live a long and full life. A long life that includes you attending the high school and college graduation of your beautiful daughters. (Please remember the words from your wonderful Father’s Day speech your girls need you too). To know that you were a good husband for your beautiful and loving wife for 50 years is worth more than you “proving” your legitimacy by going on a trip to Iraq.

http://yourblackpolitics.blogspot.com/2008/05/delegitimation-of-senator-barack-obama.html

This is God’s divine purpose for your life Senator Obama. The only way that you will lose this election is if your name is not on the ballot.


Vera Richardson is the author of “A Case of Racial Discrimination and Retaliation Real or Imagined.”
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbninquiry.asp?ISBN=9780615177014

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Barack Obama's Speech on Father's Day

BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH

Sen. Barack Obama was roundly criticized by some in the black community for having the audacity to go before the Apostolic Church of God, in Chicago, Il, a black forum, on Father’s Day, and suggest that young black men should step up to the plate and become better fathers. He pointed out that the foundation of the entire nation is being shaken by too many young fathers of every race and ethnicity failing to embrace their responsibilities, but the problem is particularly pronounced in the black community, where one half of all children grow up without a father in the home, a number that has doubled since he was a child.

He went on to point out that children who grow up without a father in the home are five times more likely to grow up in poverty, nine time more likely to drop out of school, and twenty times more likely to end up in prison. He also spoke of his own experience without a father. He recalled seeing how embarrassed his mother was to have to go to the market with food stamps in order to feed the family, and the pain she suffered when she couldn’t get him some of the things that other children had. He also spoke of the epidemic of children killing children in the black community, then asked, “How many are we willing to lose?”

I was caught completely slack-jawed that anyone in our community would take issue with such a pertinent and timely message, but with my own unbelieving eyes, I read one of the nation’s most prominent black scholars asking, “If you have a message about the value of fatherhood, why did you wait to speak at a predominantly black church to give the message only to black parents?”

What?!!!

Had Senator Obama gone to a predominantly white forum to criticize black fatherhood, there might have been some validity to the argument that it was inappropriate, but that was far from the case. First, it wasn’t black fatherhood he was criticizing–in fact, he took the time to commend those black fathers who had stepped up to the plate. He also went out of his way to praise Michelle’s father, who in spite of a severe disability that forced him to get up an hour earlier than he would have ordinarily had to just to get to work on time, managed to step up to the plate and bring the type of excellence to his parental responsibility that allowed him to raise two well rounded and successful children. So he wasn’t criticizing black fatherhood at all–on the contrary, he was encouraging those being less than responsible, to rethink their way of life.

And as for the propriety of addressing this issue in a predominantly black forum, I don’t understand the objection–he told the truth, in a black setting, as a black man who grew up without a father. Who better to speak to an issue that needs so badly to be addressed in the black community, than one of the most prominent figures in the community who ever lived? And what would be a more appropriate place to deliver such a message than in a black church, among black people? He would have been remiss not to have given such a speech.

We always talk about the courage to speak truth to power, and that’s exactly what Sen. Obama demonstrated. He’s not stupid–he remembers the backlash that came down on Bill Cosby for broaching this very same subject. Yet, in spite of the fact that he desperately needs black support to win the presidency, he decided that it was so important to delivered this message to his people that he took a chance on losing that support. That is the true meaning of speaking truth to power.

We’re often hoodwinked by demagogues to believe that speaking truth to power means screaming at those holding the highest offices. But power is relative, and true power belongs to those who are most apt to have an immediate impact on our lives. During the fifties and sixties speaking truth to power meant speaking out to the powers that be on the issue of civil rights. Back then it took great courage to do that, as the murder of Malcolm, Martin, and many others will attest. But speaking out on those very same issues today is meaningless. Since there’s nothing new or evocative in such a message, there’s absolutely no danger involved. That’s why you find every militant brother with lips and low self-esteem shaking his fist at the white man. It allows them to look hard, like modern day Malcolms, but without taking any of the risk that Malcolm had to endure.

True power, in this case, is not the government or Barack Obama–true power lies within the status quo, and peer pressure. So if we really want to speak truth to power in this case, we need to be asking why are we criticizing a man that’s advocating personal responsibility while lionizing people like Fifty cents, or ‘Fiddy’, as he’a affectionately called, who’s getting filthy rich by denigrating the very womb of our culture. And if we want to speak truth to power, we should be asking, why are we allowing Langston Hughes and James Baldwin to be all but forgotten, while black Ph.D.s are running around on national t.v. quoting entire courses of Tupac videos–which isn’t to say that Tupac’s not relevant, but it’s about priorities.

Ironically, among the many criticisms that was made about Sen. Obama’s speech was that he was contributing to the stereotyping of black men by suggesting that more of us help our sisters raise our children.

Stereotyping?!!!

Every time a rap video is made that denigrates black women and portray black men us as ignorant, illiterate, and vulgar, it serves as a commercial that goes around the world that says, black men are stupid. Now, that’s stereotyping. And we constantly put out these commercials saying “I’m a gangster, I want to kill my brother, and the queen of my culture is a slut ”, then when we’re treated like idiots, we want to point to Sen. Obama?!! The level of disconnect is amazing.

In contrast, I recently saw a remake of King Kong. While watching it, the first thing that caught my interest was how differently the white man portrays his women. The entire point of that movie was how this white, blue-eyed white woman made the Earth stand still. When they took that white woman ashore and the natives laid eyes on her blond hair, and blue eyes, they went totally berserk—I mean, into an absolute frenzy. In spite of the fact that the island was full of black women, the natives were convinced that nothing in this world would appease this twenty-five foot gorilla like the opportunity to lay his hands on this one White woman. And it turns out they were right, because the minute King Kong laid eyes on her, he forgot about all else. Thereafter, he fought forty foot snakes, numerous dinosaurs, and finally, the United States Air Force, just for the love of this one White woman, who wasn’t even as big as his thumb.

Now that, is the lesson that Obama was trying to teach–and since he had a white mother, and was raised by white grandparents, he has some perspective on that, as oppose to mere speculation. So instead of criticizing him, we need to listen to this black man. He understands that the white man believes in respecting his women because he recognizes that she symbolizes his culture, and everything he is. On the other hand . . .

Fifty Cents:

"Fuck Dat Bitch"
"If a bitch don't like me
“Somethin's' wrong with the bitch...(fuck that bitch)
"Why...oh why...why..you wanna fuck with me now?"

And you say Obama is stereotyping the black man . . . I’d say you’re trying to shoot the messenger.

Eric L. Wattree
wattree.blogspot.com

Barack Obama Leading McCain in Battle Ground States

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sen. Barack Obama is leading Sen. John McCain in the crucial swing states of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida, according to a new survey.

1 of 2 Obama lost the Democratic primary in Pennsylvania by 9 percentage points. But a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday shows him leading McCain by 12 points, 52 to 40 percent.

In Ohio, a state Obama lost to Sen. Hillary Clinton by 10 points in March, he's leading McCain 48 to 42 percent.

And in Florida, where he did not campaign this primary season and lost an unsanctioned Democratic contest, he leads McCain 47 to 43 percent.

Click to Read More.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Can We Call Americans Racist and Still Expect to Get Their Vote?

BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

CAN WE CALL AMERICANS RACIST

AND STILL EXPECT TO GET THEIR VOTE?

Michelle Obama made a simple statement-- "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of this country"–and one would have thought she declared a jihad on America. FOX news, Rush Limbaugh, and the various other Republican conduits have been harping on it for months now, trying to convince the American people that she's hated America all of her life. But the fact is, when Michelle Obama made the above statement she was actually complimenting America.

Conservatives are representing her statement as though she said, "For the first time in my adult lifetime I am proud of my country." That implies that she has never been proud of her country before. But that is not what she said at all. She said, "For the first in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country." When she used the word "really" as a modifier to the word "proud" it means that she is "exceptionally" or "more proud" of her country than she's ever been before.

You'd think I wouldn't have to explain such a simple grammatical construction to professional journalists, but when one decides to invent a story, it often becomes necessary to conveniently overlook facts clearly before one's eyes.

That transparent misrepresentation of the facts not only shows the desperation of the Republican Party, but it also shows how the country has ended up in the shape that we currently find ourselves. For the past thirty years conservative strategy has been based on the assumption that the American people are stupid, and America's reasonable belief that we should be able to trust our institutions has allowed Republicans to play us like a fiddle. But that is a part of the journey that America has embarked upon during this election–a journey towards change.

Due to a confluence of events in this country-- 911, the ineptitude, excesses, and greed of the Bush administration, and the seeming paralysis of the left–the ship of state has drifted into such rough waters that it has served to rouse a sleeping giant--the pragmatic center within the American electorate--and Sen. Obama has been sent as their agent of change.

This previously dormant but huge majority in the American electorate is generally content to maintain national equilibrium by allowing the antipathy between the right and left wings of the electorate to balance one another out, but the nation's fear after 911 has allowed the right wing to indulge its most fascistic tendencies, while the left has been rendered, literally, impotent. So America's sleeping giant has arisen to take over the helm, and as a result, the fringies on both extremes of the political spectrum are screaming bloody murder, and employing every divisive tactic at their command to maintain control.

On the one hand we have those on the right looking beneath every log trying to find a way to smear Barack Obama, and they're being given able assistance by opportunists on the left who can't resist the opportunity to embrace their 15 minutes of fame. Then on the other hand, we have those on the left complaining that Sen. Barack Obama should be standing firm behind those very same opportunists who have chosen this critical moment to wag their finger at America.

It is clear that there is no reasoning with the people on the right. They've had it totally their own way for the past seven years, and they see no reason to change. They've shown throughout the Bush administration that they don't deal in reason. Their weapon of choice is emotion–they deal in hatred, fear and anger, exclusively. In fact, the right has been so successful in playing on our emotions that the left has come perilously close to embracing that very same political philosophy as their own. As a result, political discourse in this country has degenerated into a schoolyard brawl. So at this point, instead of addressing the nation's pertinent issues, both the left and the right are allowing themselves to be distracted by meaningless side issues, which has left the ship of state adrift.

So now the political center has arisen to give Sen. Obama the mandate of bringing some vestige of equilibrium back to the nation, but the left is still fighting yesterday's battle, and arguing that Obama is selling out by resigning from his church and not standing by Rev. Wright. Some are even saying that Obama is deserting black people completely in his pursuit of the presidency. But that's patently ridiculous. Obama is simply being prudent and following his mandate of distancing himself from any, and all, non-productive influences. In fact, he's doing exactly what anyone of common prudence would do in their personal life.

If you were going on an interview for the most important job of your life, as the CEO for a large corporation, for example, would you take along your militant old uncle to tell the board of directors how racist their company has been towards black people? Of course not–that would not only be imprudent, but foolish. Yet, that's exactly what some of us are asking Obama to do.

Others are taking the reverse position, and placing malevolent intent at America's door. They contend that Sen. Obama is being "forced" to distance himself from Rev. Wright due to the country's tendency towards racism. That's patently ridiculous as well, since the nation's frontrunner for president is, indeed, a black man. It is my opinion that many blacks are not placing enough significance on that extremely salient point. That isn't to say that racism no longer exists in America, but the fact that a black man may very well be the next President of the United States makes a very profound and inescapable statement about the American people as a whole.

Thus, while it is true that the senator should have every right to attend the church of his choice, and associate with whomever he chooses, the fact is, he does have that right–but only if he doesn't want to be president. It is important to remember that voters also have rights--and fundamental among them is their absolute right to set the ground rules upon which their vote will be delivered. So while Sen. Obama has the right to associate with whomever he likes, the voter has just as much right to say I'm not going to vote for you because I don't like your associates. And that's neither unfair nor racist–it's politics.

In addition, Rev. Wright brought much of his national disfavor upon himself. While I defended him initially because it wasn't his fault that opponents dug up one of his sermons and presented him in the worse possible light, the issue might have been rendered moot had Wright been content to redefine his image during the Bill Moyers interview. But the good reverend just couldn't resist strutting under the spotlight of the National Press Club. His decision in that regard was not only ill advised and a public relations disaster, but it represented nothing less than a lose cannon propelled by a huge ego in full self-service–and, at the very worse possible moment in American history. So in light of what was on the line, Rev. Wright's behavior was both unconscionable, and indefensible.

So the common-sense question that needs be asked on the left, and by black people in particular, is not whether or not Sen. Obama was forced to dump Rev. Wright, but rather, what kind of fools are we to think that Americans are going to allow us to shake our finger in their face, call them racists, and then expect them to deliver their vote for a black man as president?

We need to wake up.

Eric L. Wattree

wattree.blogspot.com



Stay on top of what's going on around you. From Hip Hop to world and national news--stay informed about those things that impact both the Black community and the entire world, as interpreted by Dr. Boyce Watkins and some of the nation's top Black writers. Stay in touch with Your Black World www.yourblackworld.com/. It's our piece of the net.